There must always be enough pCPUs available to support the number of vCPUs assigned to a single virtual machine or the virtual machine will not boot. However, one of the major advantages of vSphere virtualization is the ability to oversubscribe, so there is of course no ratio between the number of vCPUs that can be assigned to virtual machines and the number of physical CPUs in the host. For vSphere 6. For every workload beyond a vCPU to pCPU ratio to get processor time, the vSphere hypervisor must invoke processor scheduling to distribute processor time to virtual machines that need it.
The higher the ratio becomes, the higher the performance impact will be, because you have to account for the length of time that a virtual machine has to wait for physical processors to become available.
The metric that is by far the most useful when looking at CPU oversubscription, and when determining how long virtual machines have to wait for processor time, is CPU Ready.
In the absence of any empirical data, which is generally the case on a heterogeneous cloud platform, it is a good practice, through the use of templates and blueprints, to encourage your service consumers to start with a single vCPU and scale out when it is necessary.
While multiple vCPUs are great for workloads that support parallelization, this is counterproductive in the case for applications that do not have built in multi-threaded structures.
Therefore, while a virtual machine with 4 vCPUs will require the hypervisor to wait for 4 pCPUs to become available, on a particularly busy ESXi host with other virtual machines, this could take significantly longer than if the VM in question only had a single vCPU. Service providers must, where possible, try to educate their consumers on provisioning virtual machines with the correct resources, rather than indiscriminately following physical server specifications that software vendors often refer to in their documentation.
In the event that they have no explicate requirements, advise the consumer to start with a single vCPU if possible, and then scale up once they have the metric information on which to base an informed decision. However, in the world of shared platform and multitenant cloud computing, where this is unlikely to be the case, and the application workload will be unknown, it is critical to not overprovision virtual CPUs, and scale out only when it becomes necessary.
The actual achievable ratio in a specific environment depends on a number of factors:. The newer the version of vSphere, the more consolidation is possible. For instance, offering lower CPU consolidation ratios on higher tiers of service or the reverse.
Use the following figure as a starting point to calculate consolidation ratios in a VMware Cloud Provider Program design, but remember for every single rule there are exceptions and calculating specific requirements for your tenants is key to a successful architecture.
This figure is for initial guidance only. Figure As a general guideline, attempt to keep the CPU Ready metric at 5 percent or below. For most types of platforms, this is considered a good practice.This topic is always a perpetual debate to define the proper ratio of physical CPU to virtual CPU in any virtualized environment.
Neither any vendor has the thumb rule number to derive this ratio. Numerous times we have asked this candid question to ourselves or to our fellow architects, from a commercial point of view that - why the workload optimization trend i. No of workload running on a host which is ultimately talking about over commitment is not increasing even though the processing efficiency of underlying hardware has tremendously enhanced, followed by cost of course. So it might be a parallel enhancement for the processing efficiency of underlying hardware as well as the OS and APP.
Example some kernels, program the virtual system timer to request clock interrupts at Hz interrupts per second and some kernel use Hz. However the best practices are always in place based on the market research and majority of acceptance, to define the ration for your need.
We had always been of the mind-set that when provisioning new VMs it is best to start with less vCPUs and add more as they are required, unless we specifically know that this application will be craving more resources. Many has pointed out that the single vCPU mind-set is obsolete and we can always debate on this because the older operating systems being uni-processor i.Virtual CPU and Memory Concepts
Sizing Factors:. Kindly note that hyper-threading does not actually double the available of physical CPU. It works by providing a second execution thread to a processor core.
So, a processor with 4 physical cores with hyper threading will appear as 8 logical cores for scheduling purposes only.
When one thread is idle or waiting, the other thread can execute instructions. The VMkernel uses a relaxed co-scheduling algorithm to schedule processors. With this algorithm, every vCPU does not have to be scheduled to run on a physical processor, at the same time, when the virtual machine is scheduled to run. The number of vCPUs that run at once depends on the operation being performed at that moment. There is non-trivial computation overhead for maintaining the coherency of the shadow page tables.
The overhead is more pronounced when the number of vCPUs increases. Overhead memory also depends on the number of vCPUs and the configured memory for the guest operating system. This migration can incur a small CPU overhead. If the migration is very frequent it might be helpful to pin guest threads or processes to specific vCPUs. Note that this is another reason not to configure virtual machines with more vCPUs than they need. Many operating systems keep time by counting timer interrupts.
The timer interrupt rates vary between different operating systems and versions. In addition to the timer interrupt rate, the total number of timer interrupts delivered to a virtual machine also depends on a number of other factors: The more vCPUs a virtual machine has, the more interrupts it requires.
Delivering many virtual timer interrupts negatively impacts virtual machine performance and increases host CPU consumption. If you have a choice, use guest operating systems that require fewer timer interrupts. Juggling can be the manipulation of one object or many objects at the same time, using one or many things.
VM Sizing Best Practices in vSphere
Recall the circus or event which you must have seen in child hood. Now we can associate this game or art with memory and CPU virtualization to understand it easily. Your email address and mobile number will not be published. This blog is in very detail and Jugger's theory is awesome Yes this is the matter we always discuss with our clients Hi Uma, Keep it up, Really a wonderful site, will be coming back to this site for more info for sure. Great content!.
Well explained. You may differ on this statement because you will know your applications and environment needs and requirements far more than any best practices will dictate.I have a doubt concerning the relation between the physical capacity and virtual capacity for processing. Actually, there is not direct relationship between physical and vCPUs. I suggest reading this document to gain a better understanding of physical vs virtual resource allocation and overcommitment: Best Practices for Oversubscription of CPU, Memory and Storage in vSphere Virtual Environments.
Excerpt from white paper, specifically discussing CPU overcommitment:. While some responses continue to advocate for a ratio, from a pure density standpoint, should be considered a worst-case scenario. In the diagram to the left, note that this particular lab has a current ratio of Some respondents indicate that they have received guidance that suggests no more than a 1.
Still others indicate that VMware itself has a real world recommended ratio range of to The actual achievable ratio in a specific environment will depend on a number of factors:.
The newer the version of vSphere, the more consolidation that should be possible.
Now, I'd target to I have been doing this VMware for more than 10 years now and consulted on hundreds of client environments. Rarely, if ever do you see actual CPU overuse. Oversubscription maybe, but not over use.
There are exceptions, however observation will allow you to hone-in on the actual ratio that renders optimal utilization without contention. I'd like to extend this question specifically as it relates to HA. In a small environment 2 hostsif you've oversubscribed at say a ratio are you going to kill your server if one goes down? We have 3 hosts but the third is offsite for replication at another office. So I have two usable servers on site.
Right now I'm running a ratio so that if a host goes down, I don't kill the performance on the other server. And I have tested this setup and nobody even realized we were running on one host. Any input would be appreciated. The answer is, of course, it depends. While optimum design is n-1, budgets often make this impossible.
I shoot for as close to that as possible, but in the event of over-committed hosts, I'm ready to first shut down any non-critical guests and I have no issue standing in the boss' office explaining why we are running a bit slower.
That will trigger one of 2 things.
Subscribe to RSS
When you set "protect against X Host failures" you are essentially creating a cluster-wide default reservation as big as X host resources. In a 2 host cluster, it is difficult to compliment Admission Control and still have usable resources. I never recommend or deploy 2 host clusters for this specific reason. Without admission control, the remaining host s operate on a best effort basis and there may be contention for CPU.
Software developers often recommend these as a way of prioritizing one VM over another, but CPU or Memory reservations adversely affect the availability of the entire environment - and should be disregarded except in justified use cases.In a previous post we discussed overcommitting VMware host memory — the same can be done with host CPU. In most environments ESXi allows significant levels of CPU overcommitment that is, running more vCPUs on a host than the total number of physical processor cores in that host without impacting virtual machine performance.
This post will discuss calculating CPU resources, considerations in assigning resources to virtual machines VMsand which metrics to monitor to ensure CPU overcommitment does not affect VM performance. Our Overcommitting VMware Resources Whitepaper delivers the guidelines you need to ensure that you are properly allocating your host resources without sacrificing performance.
The number of physical cores pCPU available on a host is calculated as:. If the cores use hyperthreading, the number of logical cores is calculated as:.
Please note that hyperthreading does not actually double the available pCPU. Hyperthreading works by providing a second execution thread to a processor core. When one thread is idle or waiting, the other thread can execute instructions.
Skew values that are too high typically over a few milliseconds are an indication that the VM is unable to access all its processors synchronously. Since the co-stopped VM had to wait for enough physical processors to be available to accommodate all its virtual processors, strict co-scheduling could result in scheduling delays and idle physical CPUs. Relaxed co-scheduling looks at per-vCPU skew values rather than looking at the cumulative skew values.
Relaxed co-scheduling provided significant improvements in CPU utilization and made it much easier to scale VMs up to larger numbers of processors. Access our online demo environment, see how to set up your VMware monitoring, view dashboards, problem events, reports and alerts.
Please log in using the credentials below:. Figure 2: esxtop showing a VM with a high co-stop value.
How to decide VMware vCPU to physical CPU ratio
Want to learn more? Download our Overcommitting VMware Resources Whitepaper for the guidelines you need to ensure that you are getting the most out of your host resources without sacrificing performance.
Try Longitude Live Online Demo! We value your privacy and will not display or share your email address. Sign Up for the Blog. Heroix will never sell or redistribute your email address. Copyright Heroix Corporation.
Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It only takes a minute to sign up.
I am trying to find some documentation or best practice guides for virtualization with respect to provisioning vCPUs per physical core of a CPU. If it matters, I am looking at vmWare for the virtualization implementation.
I am interested in learning more about provisioning beyond just one vCPU per one physical core. The vendor I am talking to definitely thinks that a single core can be provisioned into multiple vCPUs.
What I commonly see in my research thus far is, "Well, it depends on your application. Of course not all of the VMs need to be configured with multiple vCPUs per core, but in the general case. You rarely run out of CPU resources in virtualization solutions. RAM and storage are always the limiting factors In fact, more often than not you will actually end up with lower performance as opposed to running on a single vCPU that has one core assigned to it, in part because of the scheduling overhead required to run multiple vCPUs.
Of course that's taking office work desktops into account. If your VMs are really busy with compiling code all the time you may not be able to fit 5 vCPUs per physical core. The reason why so many people say that "it depends" is because it really does.
In your case, if you are compiling large programs, it's entirely possible that your VMs will actually need a lot of CPU time.
The underlying problem is basically the same as with process-scheduling on a physical system. As long as the system load is below the number of cores or even logical processors, in case of HyperThreading all is well and the processors can handle the load. So as long as the concurrent load on all used vCPUs does not exceed the load that can be handled by your physical cores all is well. For your demands only compiling is a CPU-intesive work, which is only needed from time to time.
So if there is a need to compile, it will be done as fast as possible if your compiler supports paralell compiling. This might not be true for a compiler-VM that is under constant load e. One rule of thumb i've seen possibly in VMware's documentation is not to allocate more cores to a VM than physically exist on the host, because that would cause multiple vCores to be emulated on a single core, adding unnecessary overhead.
Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. Asked 6 years, 11 months ago. Active 6 years, 2 months ago.VMs with large memory requirements may change the optimal virtual CPU socket allocation depending on physical resources of the host. This post is to discuss sizing VMs and how the default cores per socket value might not be the best for the performance of the virtual machine.
Keep reading for a few list of best practices for cores-per-socket values, when to use Hot Add and using hyper threads to create monster VMs. The following charts use a host with 2 sockets with 10 cores each. If your physical server has more than 20 cores, just follow the pattern shown here.
Hyper threading is a great technology for making more use of server processors. Best practice is to enable hyper-threading on hosts used for virtualization. This scenario is not the same as creating four VMs each with 10 cores on the 20 core server.
This would be an example of a over allocation and leverages VMware CPU scheduling to keep everything in check. For new VM deployments, s ize VMs small to begin with and add resources as required, making data driven decisions. VMware vSphere 6. Your email address will not be published. What is vNUMA? Crack open those templates and align the cores per sockets to match the best practices chart above.
Evaluate the effort of re-configuring everything else good hygiene. But, as the steward of your environment, just make a plan and slow work your way through the environment. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.Keep the vSphere vMotion connection on a separate network. You can do this either by using VLANs to segment a single physical network or by using separate physical networks the latter is preferable. See VMkernel Networking Layer. Consider these best practices when you configure your network.
To ensure a stable connection between vCenter ServerESXiand other products and services, do not set connection limits and timeouts between the products. Setting limits and timeouts can affect the packet flow and cause services interruption. Isolate from one another the networks for host management, vSphere vMotion, vSphere FT, and so on, to improve security and performance. This separation also enables distributing a portion of the total networking workload across multiple CPUs.
The isolated virtual machines can then better handle application traffic, for example, from a Web client. To physically separate network services and to dedicate a particular set of NICs to a specific network service, create a vSphere Standard Switch or vSphere Distributed Switch for each service. If this is not possible, separate network services on a single switch by attaching them to port groups with different VLAN IDs.
In either case, verify with your network administrator that the networks or VLANs you choose are isolated from the rest of your environment and that no routers connect them. You can add and remove network adapters from a standard or distributed switch without affecting the virtual machines or the network service that is running behind that switch.
If you remove all the running hardware, the virtual machines can still communicate among themselves. If you leave one network adapter intact, all the virtual machines can still connect with the physical network. To protect your most sensitive virtual machines, deploy firewalls in virtual machines that route between virtual networks with uplinks to physical networks and pure virtual networks with no uplinks. Physical network adapters connected to the same vSphere Standard Switch or vSphere Distributed Switch should also be connected to the same physical network.
If several VMkernel network adapters, configured with different MTUs, are connected to vSphere distributed switches, you might experience network connectivity problems.